Sociology and Family Members

Family SOC hundred and one Introduction to Sociology Instructor Sheila Farr November, 12th 2012 The sociological institutions I gift chosen for this paper is family. The family is the inaugural group of deal with whom the baby has contact, and they atomic number 18 the close important, especially in the early years. They provide food, shelter, wangle, education, and support. They describe and define the populace to the developing child. They t distributively values, morals, and beliefs. (Vissing, 2011) A individual is defined by the family and they be taught how to live a certain focus, but as they grow up order start to influence their decisions.In this paper I provide guess the extend to sociological theories Functionalism, Conflict, and Interactionism, will have on a family. How does to each(prenominal) one opening apply to the selected sociological institution? The family is regarded as the most fundamental institution for all mortals because it is direct ly responsible for the care and protection of its members. The family consists of batch who are biologically related but whitethorn as well as rent battalion with whom we live and people with whom we have close emotional bonds. (Vissing, 2011) The federal agency Functionalism applies to a family is functionalist sociologists developed an analysis which showed that the family had evolved into a superior random variable. Studies by Murdock, Goode, and other(a)s were competent to show that the family, in changing its form, had been left free to concentrate on the most important functions. Parsons (1956) saw the two most important functions to be the brotherlyization of the young and the stabilization of the adult personality. The functionalist view of the family is the notion of fitted.The isolated nuclear family was seen to be a good fit for post-war Ameri substructure society. The family had been left free to make a good frolic of breeding the children, with more professi onal parents working alongside teachers and childcare experts. The family was also adapted to concentrate on the demanding kind surrounded by husband and wife. The family provided both the child and the adult with the physical and emotional support ingested for their business offices in society. It also provided the motivation to be successful in an industrial world which organize stress on achievement by individual effort.The functionalist account of the positively charged role of the family in society coincided with a period of strong creation support for the American family. Berger and Berger (1983) argue that this was a period when the American family was seen as a success, particularly in the way it placed the needs of the individual at the heart of family life. (Wilson, A, (1985) pg. 21) The way Conflict applies to a family is the conflict role can be intense and uncomfortable, as people feel strained to make choices between work and family.Relatives may be upset wh en major conflicts occurs such as financial pressures and money management trying to correspondence home, work, community, and personal responsibilities infidelity decision making and conflict resolution traffic with health problems ad defineing personal, educational, and occupational needs of family members maintaining a home and household traffic with substance abuse, crime, or domestic violence problems co-parenting divorce and stepfamilies and dealing with agedness parents. A family shoulders a trem polish offous responsibility and usually requires assistance from others as a result. For some people work may come first and may be seen as a violation of the role of macrocosmness a dedicated family member. Individuals may feel a sense of being damned if I do, damned if I dont, no matter what they end up doing. Often work comes first because responsible adults feel that they cannot care for their family if they lose their job.When people feel important at work and home, the y have a greater sense of generatively when they do not feel treasured or do work that isnt inherently meaningful, the feelings of stagnation and alienation occur. When people feel competent and happy, the systems perspective holds that they may transfer those feelings to other areas of life, whereas when people feel stagnant and hopeless, those feelings likewise pretend other aspects of their personal world. The way Interactionism applies to a family, Symbolic interaction theory analyzes society by addressing the inherent meanings that people impose on behaviors.A close emotional bond exists with them, what they speak out of us really matters, especially in the early years when children are being tenderized to understand both themselves and their place in the world. (Vissing, 2011) What are the similarities? What are the differences? The similarities between the theories are how they regard a family as a unit of measurement. Functionalism impact the functionality of family when everyone doing their part and there are no problems and, Conflict affects the family relationship as a whole, and Interactionism affects how the family interact with one another and other people.The differences between the theories are, functionalism is about the morals and values that are taught to a family to help them expatiate in society, Conflict is based on outside influence that impact the family, and interactionism focuses on the behaviors family members pick up from socializing with unalike groups of people. How does each theory affect the views of the individual who is part of a family? Functionalism affects the views of the as a whole family, each individual person plays a role in how the family functions in society.Conflict affects the views of the individual because that person will struggle for to be heard, they will differ and their actions will cause stress in the family. Interactionism affects the views of individual because they are teaching new things as t hey socialize with others. They may start to act and dress differently and do things they never done before. How does each theory affect the come near to social stir within the selected institution? Functionalism, see social castrates as undesirable because of the various parts of society will punish naturally for any problems that may arise.The way they approach social change is by not taking an active role in changes in their social environment, if things are going good they like for it to stay that way. blush if the family can benefit from the changes, they dont wont to expire the risk of causing problems for themselves or their family. The family prefers to let the changes happen naturally without interfering. Conflict, approach to social change is by putting the changes into perspective. The social conflict can have a positive impact, when properly understood, in promoting groups to find park ground, form alliances, define core values, and identify the differences.Inter actionism, approach to social change in family is people can chose to embrace the morals and values they were taught or reject them. Every individual has their own set of beliefs in a family and these beliefs are exercised depending on the individual. Family unit does not operate as a collective, even though it is believed to do so. Each individual in the family has different values that are attributed to age, associations, values, etc. A child could have pure(a) different view on a particular subject than their parents.Within the Sociological institution selected, how does each theory affect the views of society? Functionalism, view society as functioning best when there is pact about the social values and norms. Conflict can have a positive impact on society views, when properly understood, in promoting groups to find common ground, form alliances, define core values, and identify the differences. (Harper, N) Interactionism, society imposes a different set of values that can in fluence family member to do things different from the norm. To conclude, each theory has a different impact on a family.They each give insight into how society impacts a family and individual members. As person venture in the world they start to see things in different way. Functionalism is believed to focus on the family being close and being in accord on thing. They appear to have no problem cause of the agreement to not interact with any changes and just to let them happen and go with the flow. From a functionalist point of view, the family may change form and be rather diverse in its composition, but families have always existed and will protract to exist because what they do is so important.Children are born to people who will love and care for them, and are socialized about how to care for themselves and be a productive member of society. Families are the link to most of the other institutions. Conflict, causes a family to weight the pros and cons of different situations b ecause the child is now older and they are influenced by what they see from other social institutions. From a conflict approach, families may not pull in the support or assistance they need to adequately do all the things that are required of them.Some families function well, many need help, and other families are fragile or dysfunctional. The ability of the family to function depends on how the rest of the institutions interface with them. Conflict theorists acknowledge that the family cannot adequately do its job without contributions from the other social institutions. Interactionism, is about the habits family members pick up from socializing and being apart and around different groups of people. Symbolic interactionists focus on the messages that family members receive and impart to each other.Since the family is in the position of having the most intense interactions when childrens identities and bodies are being formed, what they say and do will have a of import impact on them (Cherlin, 2009 Benokratis, 2010 Lamanna & Riedmann, 2011). (Vissing, 2011) Reference Harper, N. Journeys into Justice Retrieved from http//www. journeysintojustice. com/author. htm Vissing, Y. (2011) Introduction to Sociology. Salem relegate University. Bridgepoint Education, Inc. Wilson, Adrian. Family. Routledge, 1985. p 21. Retrieved from http//site. ebrary. com/lib/ashford/Doc? id=5003764&ppg=31