Choose a half dozen or so theories that you have studied as a Term Paper

Choose a half dozen or so theories that you maintain studied as a psychology student. Describe how these theories differ from one an some otherwise, or how they are similar to one another - Term Paper usageI came to know that my understanding and knowledge of those theories was not the only one. There are some different aspects of those theories, which I never came across. I came to know that how their relativity and grouping are irrelevant and how some of them are astonishingly interrelated. Some of those theories, which made me a victim of cognitive dissonance, are given below.I pass on start with some basic theories. unstained conditioning and Operant Conditioning falls under the same group of theories. It is obvious that they are similar thats why they belong to the same group. But if we take a closer construe, we will find that they confine little in common. Although apparently they look same. Classical conditioning deals with stimulus evoking a reaction. Operant conditio ning on the other hand deals with improving of discourage a behavior. When I take a look at these two theories under the light of Aristotles four causes, I found that they very differently answer the causes. For example the final cause of authorised conditioning is to evoke a reaction or response to a stimulus. This reaction will most probably out of control of the subject. On the other hand operant conditioning encourages a subject to exhibit a certain behavior to have reword or to stay away from the punishment. at a time this encouragement to exhibit certain type of behavior is entirely in the control of the subject. Subject might chose to act otherwise. These theories are again different in answering efficient cause. In classical conditioning the efficient cause is a stimulus, an event or a thing that evokes a reaction. On the other hand operant conditioning answer efficient cause with a reward or punishment. A reward cannot evoke a reaction. These two theories have little in c ommon in formal cause. Both theories share behavior including physical action, but again a reaction is not deliberate. On the other hand a behavior for a reward will be deliberate. They might have something in