.

Wednesday, December 12, 2018

'Popular Music, Television, and Film Stars Essay\r'

'Everyone at tot both(prenominal)y ages restrain grown up admiring and idealizing at least on nonoriety, be that an actor, singer or any other famed somebody. What they do not supplicate while they ar young is whether our idols are masses we should be looking up to. Usu every(prenominal)y when population become older they realize that their mapping models at the conviction are not someone they would essential their children idolizing now. They come to the conclusion that the person they looked up to wasn’t who they truly were, it was all an act. So should a renown be considered a true draw? That is value debating. By using three characteristics of celebrities it will be issuen whether or not a repute has the potential to be a good leader. To begin, a celebrity can be known for some things, unless a leader and great percentage model is not ever so one of them. angiotensin-converting enzyme characteristic of a celebrity is be perfect. Is being perfect p ossible? No, but Paris Hilton is an pillowcase of someone who thinks they need to diet uncontrollably and stand by plastic surgery to make them chitchatm perfect. This is not nearly close enough to be a true leader, because she is giving children the wrong idea; that it’s okay to be unhealthy and to bad things to your trunk besides if to look perfect so everyone equivalents them.\r\nThe opposite word may argue that it’s not always their fault. An fashion model of this would be Demi Lavato. She suffered from bulimia and dieted because she didn’t like the way she looked. However they are wrong because although she couldn’t control her disease, there is no campaign she should have hated herself in the beginning. We need to teach the children of this genesis that it’s okay to look different. Not everyone necessarily to wear tons of makeup and be scram thin. A celebrity who can show all of these ideas is one who is truly a leader. Subsequen tly, everyone is inconsiderate in their life for their own reasons, but should children look up to the great unwashed who are selfish all the m? A successful celebrity gets money, fame, and anything they virtually want, but that is not a reason they should be selfish. An usage of a selfish celebrity would be Kim Kardashion. Everything she does is colligate to how she can get more(prenominal) fame.\r\nHer tv show, her robes line, her perfume, even her marriage was to admit her more publicity. This is not what a leader would do. The opposition would argue that everyone is selfish so why can’t celebrities be who they are; however, they are wrong because although everyone is selfish it’s not as bad as celebrities and non-famous populate aren’t the ones trying to get children and fans to be just like them. Children need to learn that it is important to educate aside time to help those who need more help than they do. John Cena is a great causa of this. He i s a famous wwe wrestler who gets remunerative a lot and has many fans, however, he takes the time to support the American Red Cross and goes to see children with diseases and cancer to try and make their day better. This is a great way to show how to be a leader. Lastly, something very common in the celebrity domain of a function is failed marriages. How are the newer generation’s children supposed to know that, although what they see on the tv and in magazines, they are really supposed to marry someone because they love life them and want to be with them for the rest of their lives?\r\nâ€Å"Till close do us part.” right? Wrong the tv, music, and famous world is showing that it’s okay if marriages male parent’t work out, that they can just uncovering someone else or someone’s at that matter. These celebrities like Kim Kardashion and Kris Humphries were married for 10 months. The only reason they got married was because marrying a famous bask etball player with lots of money would defiantly give Kim the publicity she wanted. The opposition may argue that it’s their life and there’s no reason they should be judged by their private life; however, they are wrong because when someone is brought into this industry, their private life is all everyone hears about.\r\nJust because they are famous doesn’t think they can’t get married because of love. An example of a good couple that shows a leader quality would be Tim McGraw and Faith Hill. They are both country singers and have been married for 16 years with three children. Who said that marriage in showbiz had to finale so soon? A leader isn’t someone willing to stage a shammer marriage for a bigger fan base. Concisely, these geezerhood it is getting increasingly hard to tell the departure between a true leader and role model from a fake one. In the celebrity business there are three characteristics much(prenominal) as, perfection, self ishness, and fakeness that results in, are once role models turning into people who we look down upon. It is important to look at people for who they are as a person and what they can do for the people around them, quite an than idolizing people for their fashion, money and fame.\r\n'

No comments:

Post a Comment