John F Kennedy and Nikita Khrushchev

succeeding(a) humanness War II, the world felt the intensifying of the Cold War. Although the primary election players were the United States and Russia, countries around the globe sat on the edge of their seats, time lag for the tension to rupture and a third World War to erupt. two leaders had the fate of the world in their hands, during this era of world history, Nikita Khrushchev and antic F. Kennedy.This paper will begin by overviewing each of these goodish leaders. next these overviews, the lead styles will hence be compared and contrasted. In so doing, a clearer understanding will be developed of how two very various leaders could so effectively lead the two most unchewable nations, during one of the most intense times in world history. rump F. Kennedy was the 35th death chair of the United States, leading the nation from 1961 until his assassination on November 22nd, 1963. He was the youngest person ever to have been elected as President, and the youngest Preside nt to die. He is oft seen as an American martyr ( rear F. Kennedy, 2005).Kennedy is cognise for his strong domestic and foreign policies. Although most of his civil rights policies didnt come into serious fruition until his successor, Lyndon Johnson, came into scoreice, due to his untimely death, Kennedy was an innovator two within and outdoors of Americas borders. He was a ethereal that had a the dedication needed to claim these visions to life. His leaders skills would be honed when a young Kennedy was finally accepted into the U.S. Navy, in 1941, where he earned the rank of lieutenant and commanded a patrol wedge shape boat, or PT boat (John F. Kennedy, 2005).In 1943, Kennedys leadership skills would be demonstrated, 18 years prior to his holding office and leading a nation in a tumultuous time. Kennedys boat, the PT-109 was rammed while involved in a military raid near the Solomon Islands. Although Kennedy was thrown across the orna handst and injured his back, which had previously plagued him with problems, he was able to tow a maimed man three miles across the ocean to an island. He was awarded the Navy and shipboard soldier Corps Medal, with the following citation that sums up his exemplary leadership. During the following 6 days, (Kennedy) succeeded in repayting his crew ashore, and after swimming many hours attempting to bulletproof aid and food, finally effected the rescue of the men. His courage, endurance and excellent leadership contributed to the saving of several lives and was in keeping with the highest traditions of the United States Naval answer (as cited in John F. Kennedy, 2005).Following World War II, Kennedy began his career in politics. In 1946, Kennedy won the vacated seat of Representative James M. Curley, by a large margin. He was reelected to this flummox twice, but his take record was often contradictory to President Harry Truman, as well as different from the Democratic company as a whole (John F. Kennedy, 2005). This voting record was a demonstrative example of a Kennedy who would go on to prove that he was a man unto himself, as a upcoming President.In 1952, Kennedy moved his political career one step anterior with the defeat of Republican incumbent Henry Cabot Lodge, Jr. for Senator of Massachusetts. His bid for the position of Vice President nomination at the Democratic National Convention, in 1956, although turned down, also bolstered his career. He also adroitly handled the accomplished Rights passage of 1957 by voting for final passage, but also earlier had voted for the jury trial amendment which would have made the Act quite ineffective (John F. Kennedy, 2005).Nikita Khrushchev was born in the village of Kalinovja, in what is now known as Kursk Oblast of the Russian Federation. He was originally trained and worked as a thermionic vacuum tube fitter for a variety of mines, but it was during World War I, that Khrushchevs leadership would begin to emerge, as he began to be invol ved in traffic union activities, following the Bolshevik revolution, in 1917. A year later, Krushchev became a ships company member and held various management and political party positions in both Donbass and Kiev. In 1931, he transferred to Moscow, and four years later, he became initiatory secretary of the Moscow City Committee. In 1938, he was given the position of 1st Secretary of the Central Committee of the Ukranian Communist Party. Krushchev continued to work his modal value up the Party ladder and was a member of the Politburo from 1939 (Nikita Khrushchev, 2005).During the Second World War, Khruschev served as a political officer, holding a rank kindred to Lieutenant General, in the United States. He coordinated the defense of the Ukraine and then was the senior political officer in the South of the Soviet center throughout the war. Stalins death in March of 1953 instigated a power fight between several different factions within the Party. Khrushchev prevailed and bec ame Party leader on September 7th, 1953 (Nikita Khrushchev, 2005).A Comparison of Kennedy Versus KhrushchevKhrushchev was a powerful leader of Russia during a chaotic time. He immediately began to seek a course of reform, which was exemplified in his famous Secret Speech, that was given to the 20th Party Congress, in 1956. Khrushchev alien himself from the more conservative members of his Party, speaking out against Stalins actions, especially those crimes committed during the majuscule Purges (Khrushchev, 1956).This is in direct comparison to Kennedys early leadership style. Kennedy too refused to obviously do as the Democratic Party demanded. He often voted against Party lines, to the chagrin of traditional Liberals. Although both men would alienate themselves from some of their Party members, both would gain increased acceptance from more moderate Party members, and respect from many because of their willingness to do what they felt was right, not what was popular.Their dedica tion to their visionary leadership goals was a similarity, while their personal styles were in severe contrast. Khrushchev was often seen as uncivilized and boorish. He had a reputation for his significant offense and often resorted to interupting speakers to insult them. Khrushchev was known for pounding his fists on the table and cheering during a United Nations conference in 1960, and even taking off his shoe and pounding it violently on the table, when asked how he could oppose westbound captilist imperialism given his actions to rapidly assimilate Eastern Europe (Khrushcheva, 2000). Whereas Kennedy grew up in a wealthy, refined family and would never have considered to resort to such measures to get his point across.Yet, both men were incredibly charismatic, able to eloquently show up themselves and rally their citizens behind them in a call of patriotism. Although both men had significantly different styles, they were both able to manipulate the emotions of their citizens t o secure their leadership position and accomplish tasks such as the development of space programs, that others subsequently were able to complete. Even today, Kennedy receives much of the credit for great steps that he only had a small part in, such as the Civil Rights Act, which was conceived by his brother Robert Kennedy, and implemented by Lyndon Johnson. Yet, because of their ability to lead, in a difficult time, both men will be remembered as powerful opposing leaders who had much in common.