Religious Believers Understand More Essay Example for Free

apparitional Believers take in More Es imagineTo discuss this statement first we must look at the definition of understanding. Religious worshipers and scientists would probably differ in their definitions and therefore disagree from the beginning. A religious person would perhaps say that understanding the realism means knowing how to be a thoroughly person, how to represent a well life and fulfill Gods plan. A scientist would probably disagree, saying that understanding the world is having a wide familiarity and good comprehension of how the world works including theories like evolution and understanding why and how things occur. Another tenuous problem with this statement is its implication that one clearnot be a religious believer and a scientist when in fact there are many religious scientists who travel tom to have science and religion brisk harmoniously in their lives. If we are defining understanding as understanding how to live a good life, then I believe tha t the Bible and Religious Believers do understand more about the world than Scientists do.Religious Believers have a better understanding of how the universe and mans place in it was set up, and its hard for people to understand correctly because its not in scientific terms, its in myths and metaphors. You cant bewitch it with our available scientific instruments, its something you experience. Religious Believers have direct guidance from their Holy texts, e.g. for the Jewish faith, the Torah on how to live their life. They are taught, by the Ten Commandments, that they are not to steal, not to commit adultery and not to murder. one(a) criticism of scientists is that a number of assumption are made to give parameters to an experiment. Also perception can be fallible, as we expect to take hold of things, so we see them. We dont expect to see them, so we miss them out. In response to this, in the parable the invisible gardener where the religious believer trusts that the gardener c ame but couldnt be seen and the other (scientist) believing that there couldnt be a gardener because there was no empirical evidence of this. This shows that even though there was no evidence of the gardener or God they still hold a belief, whereas the scientist had to be proven. Some claim that believers still want hope.Religious Believers hope for the return of their invisible gardener, while New Atheists (Richard Dawkins and his followers) have no expectations of a new life after death, thereforelive their lives without fear of an almighty God smiting them down. In this situation, one could reason out that the Religious Believer is playing it safe, however they still understand the world better, in many cases they see it as an almighty beings creation.In conclusion, I believe that, although Scientists have proof of the succession of the earth, and that they have proven many facts of the Earth, They do not have as good guidance as Religious Believers do on understanding life.